The next step into four dimensions can be done equally mechanically. So far I hope you have found our constructions entirely unchallenging. The first gives an oblique view the second looks along one of the axes. There are several ways of doing the drawing that corresponds to looking at the cube from different angles. We take two of its faces-two squares-and connect the corners. Drawing a picture of a three dimensional cube on a two dimensional surface is equally easy. The faces together form a surface of 6xL 2 in area. So we have 3 dimensions x 2 faces each = 6 faces. We know there are 6 of them since its three dimensional axes must be capped on either end by faces. To form a cube, we take the square and drag it a distance L in the third dimension. The faces together form a perimeter of 4xL in length. So we have 2 dimensions x 2 faces each = 4 faces.
We know there are four of them since its two dimensional axes must be capped on either end by faces. It is formed by dragging the one dimensional interval through a distance L in the second dimension. The two dimensional analog of a cube is a square.
It is bounded by 2 points as its faces-the two points at either end of the interval. That distance could be 2 inches or 3 feet or anything. It is formed by taking a dimensionless point and dragging it through a distance. The one dimensional analog of a cube is an interval. The door to the fourth dimension is opening. But we can figure out in some detail how things would be different if it had two moons. The exercise is not so different from showing that we can understand what the earth would be like if it had two moons instead of one. I AM merely trying to show that we can understand what it would be like if space did happen to have four dimensions. I am NOT saying that our space is really four dimensional. Once you have seen how this is done for the special case of a tesseract, you will have no trouble applying it to other cases.ĭon't be confused by what I am trying to show here. It involves progressing through the sequence of dimensions, extrapolating the natural inferences at each step up to the fourth dimension. There are many techniques for doing this. Otherwise we can determineĪll the properties of a tesseract and just what it would be like to live in one. But that is just about the only thing we cannot do. Can I visualize what it would be like to live in the four dimensional analog of a cube, a four dimensional cube or "tesseract"? I cannot visualize this with the same effortless immediacy. Our mind's eye lets us hover about inside. There we sit in the cube with its six square walls and eight corners. What would it be like to live in a three dimensional cube? To be asked to visualize that is like being asked to breathe or blink. What would it be like?Ī three dimensional space-and you can too. I will just consider a four dimensional space that is, a space just like our three dimensional space, but with one extra dimension. My present purpose is to show you that there is nothing at all mysterious in the four dimensions of a spacetime. But where are we to put the fourth axis to make a four dimensional space? One can readily imagine the three axes of a three dimensional space: up-down, across and back to front. The problem is not the time part of a four dimensional spacetime it is the four. Nonetheless it is hard to resist a lingering uneasiness about the idea of a four dimensional spacetime. We have already seen that there is nothing terribly mysterious about adding one dimension to space to form a spacetime. Using colors to visualize the extra dimension.The four dimensional cube: the tesseract.
0 kommentar(er)
